Portland ParksAtlas

The Atlas library

Research you can take with you.

Reports for understanding the system. Comparisons for weighing the choices. Practical guides for working with the evidence.

Independent Portland Civic Lab analysis, with sources and assumptions. These reports are not City publications or adopted plans.

Reports & practical guides

4 PDFs

Public-evidence report

State of Portland Parks

30 pages · 123 KB

A systemwide picture of participation, access, maintenance, funding and the work behind everyday service. Identifies practical improvements and the evidence still needed.

Use it to: Understand where the system is strong, where experiences differ, and which questions deserve attention next.

Scope & limitations

Combines sources from different reporting periods. Attendance, registrations and visits are distinct measures; missing observations do not establish low use.

20-year funding strategy

A park system we can keep

35 pages · 156 KB

Compares recurring operating revenue, capital renewal and financing. Explains the parks-district option, levy succession, funding restrictions and the tradeoffs among 37 approaches.

Use it to: Discuss a durable funding mix, what to pursue first, and which assumptions need validation before choosing a tax or financing plan.

Scope & limitations

Independent recommendations and illustrative scenarios. Historical tax estimates are not current revenue forecasts; this is not an adopted City plan.

Reference comparison

37 funding approaches, compared

19 pages · 80 KB

A consistent comparison of each option’s best use, scale, restrictions, reliability, equity, planning time and next useful action. Includes links to the original sources.

Use it to: Compare a shortlist of funding options without treating restricted, hypothetical or overlapping revenue as money already available.

Scope & limitations

The ranking is a proposed order of effort. The options are alternatives and complements, not 37 amounts to add together.

Companion downloads

Practical guide

How to use the funding model

3 pages · 32 KB

Shows which assumptions to change, where to read the results, and why a zero accounting difference means “balanced.” Four worked examples cover growth, City support, repairs and borrowing.

Use it to: Start here before editing the workbook. Change one yellow input at a time, compare the result, then restore the starting case.

Scope & limitations

The operating example covers a defined levy-supported service block. The bond and district examples are separate from the operating and renewal schedules.

Published by the City of Portland

Go back to the original.

These PDFs open on the City’s website. The reports above interpret public evidence; these documents are the underlying official record.

  • FY2026–27 adopted budget

    Official appropriations and fund details. PP&R’s levy tables are on PDF pages 937–939 of Volume 2.

    City PDF
  • Parks Board funding alternatives

    May 2024 meeting materials. Historical financial-stability work and tax comparisons; these estimates require updating.

    City PDF
  • Capital maintenance briefing

    PP&R’s January 2025 presentation on capital maintenance and funding. Read figures in their stated period and scope.

    City PDF

Reports preserve their stated research dates. A September 2026 report may cite earlier surveys, annual measures or cost estimates; publication date does not make every underlying observation current.